![friedrich@vis.social Hartmann on X: "@moritz_stefaner @krees Less than Fifty Shades: My interpretation of the JS < truth table by http://t.co/DuIrYneAYS http://t.co/6C8fZtLCvk" / X friedrich@vis.social Hartmann on X: "@moritz_stefaner @krees Less than Fifty Shades: My interpretation of the JS < truth table by http://t.co/DuIrYneAYS http://t.co/6C8fZtLCvk" / X](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CA4ab8xXEAEUG08.png)
friedrich@vis.social Hartmann on X: "@moritz_stefaner @krees Less than Fifty Shades: My interpretation of the JS < truth table by http://t.co/DuIrYneAYS http://t.co/6C8fZtLCvk" / X
![boolean - In JavaScript, why is "0" equal to false, but when tested by 'if' it is not false by itself? - Stack Overflow boolean - In JavaScript, why is "0" equal to false, but when tested by 'if' it is not false by itself? - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/MKgie.png)
boolean - In JavaScript, why is "0" equal to false, but when tested by 'if' it is not false by itself? - Stack Overflow
![boolean - In JavaScript, why is "0" equal to false, but when tested by 'if' it is not false by itself? - Stack Overflow boolean - In JavaScript, why is "0" equal to false, but when tested by 'if' it is not false by itself? - Stack Overflow](https://i.stack.imgur.com/5bdbd.png)